|
With
commercial banks in China relying heavily on traditional loan business,
future development has faced somewhat of a bottleneck. Looking ahead
to alleviate that pressure on developmental progress in China, the
People's Bank of China recently promulgated the "Provisional
Regulation on Commercial Banks' Intermediary Business" (the
"Regulation").
The Regulation, issued and effective on July 4,2001, defines in
detail the concept of intermediary business, business scope, qualifications
and approval procedure. It also stipulates that commercial banks
may engage in investment bank business lines, such as derivative
tools, securities agency business, custody of mutual funds, financial
counseling, etc. This has been viewed in many circles as a hint
toward the future blending of the banking and securities industries,
The engagement by commercial banks in the investment banking business
will increase their income and strengthen their capacity to resist
business risks.
The Regulation also establishes a more solid base with respect
to commercial banks' intermediary businesses. PRC Commercial Banking
Law allows commercial banks to engage in various de facto intermediary
businesses, such as settlement services, issuance of government
bonds, and letter of credit services. However, a precise definition
of intermediary business has never been given. The newly issued
Regulation comes a step closer, defining intermediary business as
that business which does not constitute assets or liability on the
balance sheet, and produces income other than interest. This is
categorized into the following six classes:
1) Settlement, such as remittance, collections, etc.;
2) agency for securities, insurance etc.;
3) guarantees, such as standing L/Cs or acceptance;
4) commitment, in loan businesses;
5) foreign exchange trading agency services, as in forward transactions,
foreign exchange option dealing, and foreign exchange swaps, etc.;
6) other types of intermediary businesses, such as financial counseling
and custody of mutual funds.
As stated above, Commercial PRC Banking Law has only come a step
closer to clearly defining intermediary banking business. Among
the categories above, business lines related to securities work
still do not have clear definitions. Nevertheless, it is believed
that the implementation of the Regulation will, to some extent,
lead to the permission for commercial banks to act as securities
brokers, although the Chinese version of Glass-Steagall Act, contained
in commercial Banking Law, remains unchanged.
──Frederick Luo
|